GOP Family Values are the Antonym for Palin Family Values


For years we have been told the Republican Party is the political party who promotes “family values”.  Sarah Palin has given lip service to that position through her TLC show where she proclaims that she loves Alaska like she loves her family.  The title of her latest book, America by Heart:  Reflections on Family, Faith and Flag, Palin attempts to reinforce the value of “family”.  However the truth is that traditional “family values” is the antonym for Palin family values.

Both Todd and Sarah have been reported as having extra-marital affairs.  Sarah was pregnant out-of-wedlock, and there is a real possibility that her first child is actually the child of another man. Todd and Sarah live in separate structures on the property in Wasilla, they don’t sleep together, and evidently throw cans at each other when tempers flare.  Her fifth child may be someone else’s first child. Bristol not only is an unwed mother, but was a 17-year-old pregnant teen at the time her mother was running with John McCain.  If McCain and Palin had been elected, it would have been the first time the Vice President’s illegitimate grandchild would be living in the white house with her.  Now with the announcement of Track’s spontaneous wedding with only parents in the “picture” and a party to be held later, there is great suspicion as to why the rush?

When Sarah Palin announced that Bristol was pregnant she was quick to say that Bristol was keeping the child, and that she would marry Levi.   The amazing thing about the announcement was that Palin thought that plans to marry would make the pregnancy acceptable.  Like her marriage to Todd, she suggested that marriage to Todd would make her out-of-wedlock pregnancy acceptable.  Sarah Palin misses the point.  If a woman is too young when having a child she risks her health and that of the baby.  If the mother is too young she may not be mature enough to be the best mother she can be. As we have seen with Bristol, completing an education is difficult or impossible if a baby is in the picture.  If a man and woman marry too young their chances of having a happy and healthy marriage decline.  It can happen; it’s just not as likely.  Sarah Palin and the Republican Party miss the point to suggest that marriage alone is a sign of traditional family values.

With the recent focus on Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, and his “love child,” it is important to pause and consider the number of Republicans who have established their true attitude about traditional family values.  There was Dick Cheney’s daughter who is lesbian and she and her partner became parents.     Thomas Jefferson had 7 children out-of-wedlock.

Ted Nugent, the promoter of Palin through the Time Magazine article, had two wives and eight children, including three children out-of-wedlock.

In February of this year Congressional Republicans were involved in running a prostitution ring.

The list of Republicans who deviated from the GOP’s traditional party platform regarding family values could provide material for an entire year of SNL episodes.

Here are just a few worthy of note:

Mark Foley

U.S. Representative
(September 28, 2006)

The Crime: Sending sexually laced, grammatically challenged instant messages and e-mails to teenaged boys in the Congressional page program for more than 10 years.

The Hypocrisy: Chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children and one of the foremost opponents of child pornography in the Senate.

The Quote: “get a ruler and measure it for me”


Ted Haggard

Leader of the National Association of Evangelicals
(November 2006)

The Crime: Paying male prostitutes for sex and snorting crystal meth.

The Hypocrisy: A powerful force in the evangelical movement, Haggard participated in weekly meetings with President George Bush and top advisors where he gave spiritual advice. He taught that homosexuality was an abomination and actively lobbied against gay rights.

The Quote: “I did not have a homosexual relationship with a man in Denver.”


Larry Craig

U.S. Senator
Senate Liaison for Mitt Romney’s Presidential Campaign

(June 11, 2007)

The Crime: Soliciting sex from an undercover cop in an airport bathroom

The Hypocrisy: Craig twice voted against adding the words “sexual orientation” to the federal hate crimes law. Craig also voted to give states the right to refuse to recognize gay marriage–a right they already had, but the Senator wanted to really, really prove he didn’t like gay people.

The Quote: “I am not gay; I don’t do these kinds of things.”


Bob Allen

Member of the Florida House of Representatives
Florida Chairman of John McCain’s Presidential Campaign

(July 11, 2007)

The Crime: Offering an undercover cop $20 to allow Allen to blow him in a men’s room in a public park. After being arrested, Allen tried to explain that he only offered to blow the cop because the cop was a “burly black man” and he “didn’t want to become a statistic.”

The Hypocrisy: Allen was one of 21 Florida legislators to sign Gov. Jeb Bush’s friend-of-the-court brief supporting the state’s ban on gays adopting children, and he co-sponsored an unsuccessful bill that would have enhanced penalties for “offenses involving unnatural and lascivious acts” such as indecent exposure.

The Quote: “I certainly wasn’t there to have sex with anybody and certainly wasn’t there to exchange money for it.”


Glenn Murphy Jr.

National Chairman of the Young Republicans
Chairman of the Clark County Republican Party

(July 28, 2007)

The Crime: Murphy got a fellow Young Republican drunk and then spent the night at his house. The other young man woke up in the middle of the night to find Murphy giving him mouth-to-penis resuscitation. After this incident, a 1998 sexual battery report came to light in which Murphy was alleged to have done the exact same thing.

The Hypocrisy: Murphy was a well-paid political consultant for Republican candidates and often advised them to use gay marriage as a wedge issue to paint their opponents as out of touch with traditional values.

The Quote: “I was in the Sound of Music in High School…don’t ask” (from his now-defunct Myspace page.)

The Video: Unfortunately, the Young Republicans took down all of their videos of Mr. Murphy. So instead, I give you: http://www.badmouth.net/top-five-republican-gay-sex-scandals/

Here is a more complete list:

In considering the current we site of the Republican Party, under the “issues” section there is no reference to family values or abortion or homosexuality. Maybe they will add these in a few more weeks after the focus on Arnold, Track Palin, and Republican Rep. Paul Scott has died down.   Maybe the Republican Party and Sarah Palin should stick to politics and just consider family matters off-limits?

26 thoughts on “GOP Family Values are the Antonym for Palin Family Values

Add yours

  1. I think you mean that Cheney’s daughter IS a lesbian or did she make a full recover from her “lesbianitis?” LOL

    Like

  2. Good points, with the possible exception of the inclusion of Cheney’s lesbian daughter as an example of failed republican family values. Given its inclusion with other examples of infidelity and general wickedness, I cannot understand why you would put that there, unless you mean to cast her as an example of someone that the family values crowd would have a problem with.

    There is hypocrisy- what these people say and what they do are often vastly at odds. A gay child, though, ought not to be even a small part of the exposure of that hypocrisy.

    Like

  3. Here’s one that totally confuses me. We have a Presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich, who led the Republican call for the impeachment of President Clinton. Now it turns out Gingrich was performing the same act in his car with a Republican staff member, while he was married. When it comes to family values, this guy is the Emperor. Just because his mistress is now his wife, he thinks all is normal. Wrong! His wife is a person who has affairs with married men and breaks up families. .

    Like

    1. aj,
      And his first wife was in the hospital with cervical cancer when he asked for a divorce,and his second wife had just been diagnosed with MS when he asked for a divorce from her. What a great guy!!!

      Like

  4. I so enjoy and appreciate your WIDE perspectives. Your researching is aces! Thanks for putting it all in “the big picture”. You make it so easy for the readers to go deep; i.e., links, video’s, commentary, in depth info, and good humor. You have your own “wikipedia” – with personality (and a legal background)! Way to go!

    Like

  5. Seems many so-called leaders should be paying attention to their own morality rather than attempting to legislate moral behavior upon the citizenry.

    Then again – if we make immoral behavior criminal – these fine upstanding citizens could have been disbarred & jailed, and prevented from holding public office. ( Wow – I found the silver lining to their legislation)

    Like

  6. For some reason, I thought about the 7 deadly sins according to Christianity. They are lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, envy, pride and anger. How does this fit Sarah Palin’s Christianity? She is no Christian. She is a she-devil that works and speaks in direct opposition to the words of Christ. Actions really do speak louder than words.

    Like

  7. Neither party has real values. At least he GOp has documented values. Its members obviously love their families and would do anything for them. People are human. There no difference between dems and reps

    Like

    1. You’re full of crap, Heather, unless you’re talking THEIR personal families. Just what has the GOP done to better YOUR life today, hmmmm???? Name ONE thing.

      Like

    2. Heather, you’re so quick to pass the buck that you’ve missed the point. Republicans preach, embrace, run on the “Family Values” principles, but do the opposite. Democrats don’t preach, hence, they’re not hypocrites. If you still don’t get it, let us know and we’ll draw a graph.

      Like

    3. Sorry, Heather, but I am a proud liberal who loves her family and would do anything for them. My two kids were National Merit Scholars, god great scholarships for college based on academic ability. One is a chemical engineer out of UM who works for a major chemical company and has a lovely wife and two beloved kids. Our daughter has a law degree that also was on scholarship…no debt for either child. She has been married for nearly 10 years to a great guy…both are fully employed.My husband and I have been married 35 years…no affairs, no love children, no drugs or alcohol abuse. The GOP may have “documented values” somewhere, but they sure don;t live them, do they?
      I’ll take Democratic values any day. Those who need to go around inflicting their ‘values’ on others do not live those values, and are hypocrites.

      Like

      1. Sally,
        Congrats on the National Merit Scholars! I know what an honor that is, and I know how hard you and your kids worked to achieve that! Malia

        Like

  8. Bullshit, Heather. You are saying that a racist homophobe like George W. Bush is identical to Barack Obama. You are a Republican troll. Your party is the racist refuse of a dying empire.

    Like

  9. To Heather: Yes, the GOP has documented values: they love the fetus, hate the child; refuse to help the poor, no help for the elderly, only educate those who can possible pay for education (privatizing education), no government oversight of water, land or air pollution, privatizing prisons to incarcerate more and more people for profit, make this a one-faith nation, and make it so desirable for other nations to come HERE for cheap labor.

    Like

  10. Just read this on business insider, part of Sarah’s blather about the peace talks. While of course one can shot holes through absolutely anything she says, this one got to me. “It has long been the dream of radicals like Noam Chomsky to create a “contiguous Palestine.” True, President George W. Bush spoke ambiguously of a “contiguous” Palestinian state,. . . .
    Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/sarah-palin-israel-2011-5#ixzz1NDtL5Kwq

    Sarah can’t POSSIBLY have read one word of Noam Chomsky, and he is such an obscure figure to most Americans (unfortunately) it can only be an excuse for her to use the word radical. But who’s writing these new speeches, since we know Sarah couldn’t?

    Like

  11. an interesting article in the Sydney Morning Herald here in Australia. I’m goin to try to cut and paste… seems we have the same issues as you
    To some questions, the answer is not as simple as it seems.
    ”DAD, what are family values?” ”Why do you ask, son?”
    Son: Because Tony Abbott is always talking about them. When he spoke to the Young Liberals in January, he said: ”We support the family and values that have stood the test of time.” What are these values?
    Dad: Excellent question. Yes, we conservatives are great supporters of family values. And Tony Abbott is a good family man if ever there was one. That’s why he talked about his wife and daughters in his budget reply. He’s just what we need in this country, a PM who understands families like us. ”Forgotten families”, that’s what he called us.
    Son: Yes, but what are the exact values he’s talking about?
    Dad: The values of families like us. You know, a mother and father who love each other, and children … like you and Breehanna. A proper family.
    Son: Is he saying Julia Gillard doesn’t understand family values because she’s not part of a proper family? Because she has no kids and isn’t even married?
    Dad: Basically, yes. And quite rightly, too! Look at what she’s doing. Just because your mother and I work hard and earn good money she’s going to take away some of our benefits. You two wouldn’t be going to a private school without that money. Julia simply doesn’t understand! It’s impossible to know what family values are about unless you’re living in a proper family – a father, mother, and children.
    Son: But Julia Gillard grew up in a proper family. Didn’t she learn family values then?
    Dad: Ah … I guess so. But now she’s out of touch.
    Son: So what about Auntie Jen? She grew up in mum’s family, but now she lives with Auntie Rose. They love each other very much, and they want to have children. Is Auntie Jen out of touch, too?
    Dad: Well … I’m not sure … but there’s a difference. You see, they can’t get married. It’s the law. So they can’t be a proper family, even if they have children.
    Son: I see. Dad, didn’t Tony want to be a Catholic priest?
    Dad: Yes, he began training for the priesthood, but changed his mind. Why do you ask?
    Son: Well, Catholic priests can’t get married or have children. So are they out of touch too? Even if they grew up in proper families? Maybe that’s why Tony changed his mind.
    Dad: Er … um … possibly. But that’s different again. Priests do a lot of family counselling. It’s part of their job.
    Son: But how can they do that if they’re out of touch with family values?
    Dad: I suppose it’s their training. The Bible would teach them about family values. It talks about the importance of marriage, and says husbands and wives should love each other.
    Son: So you’re saying that to really understand family values you have to be part of a proper family … or a Catholic priest.
    Dad: Ah … yes, I guess so.
    Son: What about divorced people? And single people? And homeless people? And people who grew up in foster homes? And …
    Dad: Hang on, son, hang on! This is getting complicated …
    Son: OK, so what are Auntie Jen and Auntie Rose if they’re not a proper family?
    Dad: They’re … well, just two people living together, I guess.
    Son: Like Tim Mathieson and Julia Gillard.
    Dad: Not exactly. You see, they’re a man and a woman, so they can get married.
    Son: Would Julia Gillard understand family values better if she got married?
    Dad: I suppose so. But it’d be better if she had children.
    Son: What if she read the Bible instead? Like the Catholic priests. Would that help?
    Dad: Ummm …
    Son: Because Auntie Jen and Auntie Rose read the Bible a lot. And they go to church every week. So they must understand something about family values, even if they can’t get married. You and mum are married, but you never go to church or read the Bible.
    Dad: Well … er … it’s just that we haven’t really got time to go to church. I mean, we’re usually up at the farm on weekends, aren’t we?
    Son: So who understands family values best? You and mum, who love each other but don’t read the Bible or go to church; Auntie Jen and Auntie Rose, who love each other, read the Bible and go to church and want children but can’t get married; or Catholic priests, who have their training, but can’t get married or have children?
    Dad: Ah … well … let me think about that.
    Son: OK, dad … but I still have one question.
    Dad: Yes?
    Son: What are family values?

    Like

    1. We should ask that question of Palin, Newt and very troll we come across…what ARE family values, and who gets to decide?

      Like

  12. Perhaps I should explain that Tony Abbott is the leader of the opposition and an ex monk whilst Julia is out prime minister and is living with her partner without the benfit of marriage!!!!

    Like

  13. The thing that always bothered me about the entire “Family Values” and “Pro Life” issues of the GOP was not just the hypocrisy of the sex scandals, but the use of family to show some kind of moral high ground. George W Bush issued tons of death warrants without batting an eyelash, yet used Terri Schaivo as a cause celeb for the right to die with dignity. There was a debate over her brain function, her parents showed video of her turning her head toward light, and turning her head when someone called her name, but the husband, who wanted a divorce (and couldn’t get one without Terri’s Consent) argued and won the right to remove her feeding tube. He never divuldged where she was laid to rest, and both parents died while fighting to find out. He then cashed in a life insurance policy and married a woman he had a child with while married to Terri.
    Then there’s Bush’s revelation that his mother had a misscarriage, put the dead fetus in a jar, and showed her son what a dead fetus looked like. What kind of Family Value is that? Did it help George W become a better person? His name is on that list, and one of his two female victime was later “suicided”.
    Then there’s Rick Santorum, who took home his stillborn son, introduced him by name to all the other kids, and the whole family spent the night “bonding” He used that story to no end to proove he was pro life. Who does this to their kids? He also equated homosexuality with beastiality, vehemently refused to backtrack, and eventually lost his senate seat in Pennsylvania.
    When there is no cause celeb, they went after Murphy Browne, a fictional character, who chose to have a child without benefit of marriage.

    But extramarital horizontal belly bumping and illicit same sex encounters can be “councilled” away by a priest or preacher, or dismissed as a “youthful indescretion”.

    Now we have hallmark cards that celebrate unwed motherhood, politicians who use their kids as props for profit while promoting abstinance, and overlook the realities Malia pointed out in her post about health and marriage success rates at a young age. Once born, they overlook the high infant mortality rates and leave the baby to fend for itself, especially while cutting social programs.

    Like

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑