If you object to Sarah Palin, beware! You can predict that there will be a suggestion by someone associated with Sarah Palin, or Sarah Palin herself, that you are a sex-offender or a child molester. Even though I have no criminal record, and have never even been accused by ANYONE of being a pervert, C4P made the reference in their article about me that I was “batsh*t crazy” and compared me to a child molester. http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2010/05/pds-alert-malia-litman.html. Now I realize that I am only one of many who have been associated by Palin or her supporters as having characteristics of a child molester. When Joe McGinnis rented the house next to the Palin’s, the immediate suggestion was that he was a peeping-tom, he was harassing the family, he was a stalker, and Palin warned that “he better leave my family alone.” http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-leaps-to-palins-defense-threatens-to-boycott-random-house/.
Beck described the fact that McGinnis was living next to the Palin’s as “disturbing.” He warned that if Joe had moved next to him, the fact of his presence in the house next door would be “screwing with his wife and children.” Yet the reality is that Mr. McGinnis didn’t do anything inappropriate while living in the house next to the Palins. Not a single allegation of inappropriate behavior has even been asserted regarding McGinnis’s activities while living next to the Palins.
When David Letterman made a joke regarding Palin and Bristol, Palin retaliated by suggesting that Letterman was a child-molester. nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/06/palin_basically_calls_letterma.html. Once again we see Palin respond to a disparaging remark by lodging a personal attack on her adversary. Evidently the favored method of attack is to suggest that the person must be a sex offender.
When the issue of the firing of Walt Monegan came up, Palin once again focused on child molesting. At one point Palin suggested that the reason she fired him was that he had been too aggressive in seeking federal money to hire law enforcement officials to investigate the most egregious cases of sexual assault, including those against children.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_09/014759.php. Thus Palin was complaining that Monegan had been too aggressive in attacking the problem of child molesting.
The sad thing is that Alaska has one of the highest child abuse rates in the nation.
www.ridalaskaofchildabuse.org. From 1976-2006, a thirty year period, Alaska’s average rate of rape, 75.7 is 2.2 times greater than the national average rate of rape (35.2). http://www.muni.org/Departments/health/services/Documents/Rape.pdf
All of this might be perceived to be coincidental. However with recent revelations regarding Joe Miller, something is beginning to stink. Joe Miller, the candidate endorsed by Palin, now admits to having child pornography on the computer in his office. http://alaskawtf.com/2010/10/31/child-porn-on-joe-millers-computer-holy-sweet-jesus; http://alaskawtf.com/2010/10/31/child-porn-on-joe-millers-computer-holy-sweet-jesus. Joe Miller did not provide any form of explanation for the pornography on his computer. He didn’t even suggest that he himself was not responsible for the presence of the pornography on the computer. There has been a total lack of explanation for why the child pornography would be on HIS computer. It would seem logical that if Miller was not himself responsible for the pornography on his office computer, surely he would have taken this opportunity to explain how it came to be on his computer, or at a minimum declare that he was not responsible.
Palin has tried to divert attention by her recent wrongful accusations against CBS, calling them “corrupt bastards”.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david/sarah-palin-release-the-t_b_776674.html; http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/31/sarah-palin-joe-miller_n_776595.html. However the reality is that even if everything Palin said was true, it would not have excused Joe Miller from having child pornography on his office computer. The reality is that CBS was not involved, the station that was involved has unequivocally indicated that nothing done was improper, and Palin has failed to provide any proof of anything done by the station involved to indicate that their reporters fabricated anything.
Ben Smith reports a statement from the television channel that was involved KTVA:
“While the recording is real, the allegations are untrue,” said Bever. “The recording was the result of a cell phone not being hung up after a call was placed to Randy DeSoto, Joe Miller campaign spokesperson, Thursday afternoon to discuss Joe Miller’s appearance on that evening’s newscast. That phone call was placed near the end of a coverage planning meeting in our newsroom regarding that evening’s Miller rally in downtown Anchorage. The group of KTVA news personnel was reviewing potential “what-if” scenarios, discussing the likelihood of events at the rally and how KTVA might logistically disseminate any breaking news.”
Bever continues, “The perception that this garbled, out of context recording may leave is unfortunate, but to allege that our staff was discussing or planning to create or fabricate stories regarding candidate Miller is absurd. The complete conversation was about what others might be able to do to cause disruption within the Miller campaign, not what KTVA could do.”
While Bever would not discuss any personnel issues linked with the recording, Bever says “Have we had internal discussions about the level of professionalism we need to bring to our conversations, internally and externally? Of course we have, this is a lesson to learn from.”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1010/CBS_affliliate_Palin_Miller_charge_absurd.html.
A.C. Clarke said:
“Once is an accident; twice is a coincidence; three times….a conspiracy.”
The references by Palin to child molestation exceeds three. The only person who has indicated that he has done anything inappropriate is Joe Miller, someone endorsed by Palin, and whose honor Palin has championed. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/29/sarah-palin-joe-miller-rally_n_775834.html. Most people would consider abuse of a child to be the most heinous of crimes. It is no coincidence that Palin uses this image to attack those who disagree with her.
It is a federal crime to knowingly possess, manufacture, distribute, or access with intent to view child pornography (18 U.S.C. §2252). In addition, all 50 states and the District of Columbia have laws criminalizing the possession, manufacture, and distribution of child pornography. As a result, a person who violates these laws may face federal and/or state charges. http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=2451. As far as I can tell the people Palin has accused of child molesting have not even been accused of such a crime. Yet the person she endorses and attempts to “honor” has admitted to be in possession of child pornography.
malialitman
MaliaLitman.com 
I don’t know what to say after reading what C4P published. May the Lord, the police and FBI be watching over you as they have others for the pattern repeats when Palin and/or her supporters demonize a person. They have found it most effective to falsely allege or insinuate the most heinious crime which is molesting children. I’ll pray for your safety.
LikeLike
I totally agree with everything you wrote except for one thing. Joe Miller did not say he had child porn on his computer. He inferred that people were out to get him and that they might set him up by putting child porn on his computer. Alaska WTF was disappointingly wrong in the re-telling of that info.
LikeLike
It just hit me. All of the molester talk, the demeaning comments about men, the inner anger is stuffed feelings. She sounds like a victim of abuse going off on everyone else because she hasn’t worked through it or cannot confront her abuser. Can we send Dr. Phil up there?
LikeLike