What do Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, and Pat Buchanan have in common? The answer is easy if you go to the web site “Human Events; Powerful Conservative Voices.” Cathy Taylor is the Editor of Human Events, which is the oldest conservative weekly in the nation. The web site features columnists such as Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Thomas Sowell, and Walter Williams. This home for the far right has buttons to click at the top of the home page for Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, and Pat Buchanan. Obviously they are promoting Newt Gingrich for president, since he is the only candidate to rate a separate link featuring select articles on Gingrich.
I was drawn to this site due to an article giving credit to Sarah Palin for Newt’s success in South Carolina. Tony Lee (who appears to be one of those Asians that Palin is uncomfortable around)
is the author of an Human Events article on Palin’s influence in South Carolina.Lee coins the term “Teavangelicals” to describe the majority of the South Carolina electorate and describes them as “fierce fiscal and social conservatives.” You and I might describe them in a less complimentary way. Lee points out that 64% of those voting in the South Carolina primary, both identify themselves as “Born-Again” or “Evangelical Christians,” and support the Tea Party. While Lee also declares that the “Republican party is becoming more like South Carolina than New Hampshire” he doesn’t cite any basis for that conclusion. He identifies Sarah Palin as the leader whose judgment “Teavangelicals may trust the most.”
Palin demanded that Romney prove that he indeed created jobs in the U.S. while at Bain Capital. Palin called upon Romney to produce his tax returns. Lee gives Palin credit for not allowing Romney’s history of job creation (or lack thereof) and his wealth to be forgotten. As a final push for Gingrich, Lee identifies the importance of the fact that Palin then appeared on Fox suggesting that she would vote for Gingrich if she were a resident of South Carolina. Thus Lee feels Palin has “considerable clout” in the selection of the GOP nominee.
While many tend to trivialize the impact of Sarah Palin, the Half-Term Ex-Governor who is a grandma to two grandchildren conceived out of wedlock, the wife of an alleged peeping-tom and a man who hangs out with hookers, we should never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups,
especially when Sarah Palin is part of the group.
It’s been three years since Sarah Palin gave interviews to Katie Couric.
It’s been 2 ½ years since Sarah Palin was a politician.
It has been less than one year since Sarah proved just how clueless she is about American History.
Yet how easily people forget. People who champion the importance of faith and family, respect the very person who says she also champions faith and family, but repeatedly proves that faith and family are only important to her if they can be used by her to promote herself.








11 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 26, 2012 at 1:13 pm
Laura Lee
“but repeatedly proves that faith and family are only important to her if they can be used by her to promote herself.” You still have YET to prove this. All you’ve ever had is aimless propaganda that is fundamentally false.
January 26, 2012 at 1:46 pm
Trish
Her very actions belie the thought that faith and family are important to her. I have been around people of faith all my life, and none of them act or speak like her. From the way we have observed her treating her children to her tax records showing that she does not tithe to her overly sexualized language, she does not behave as if faith and family were important to her.
January 27, 2012 at 1:36 pm
lilly lily
To anyone with a brain in their head, Palin shows all the signs of a self centered floozy.
Sarah Palin is a total hypocrite in everything but her mean spirit. THAT is real.
Her parenting is horrendous.
The entire Republican lineup is a bunch of hypocrites, so she is in her peer group, and is comfortable with her hypocrasy, OR is it hypocrazy?
Lies, Cheating, and all the rest go hand in hand with her hypocrazieness.
January 26, 2012 at 1:19 pm
Pat Padrnos
Malia -
Please check out the Immora lMinority today. Gryphen did an article on the Brewer/Obama “dust-up”. He also has a link to a journalist in Arizona who maintains Brewer has a drinking problem – supposedly well known around the capital. He maintains she was probably tipsy when she confronted Obama.
January 26, 2012 at 2:11 pm
malialitman
Pat,
I hadn’t been to Jesse’s site today, but will go right away! Thanks
January 26, 2012 at 2:40 pm
de
Malia,
Here’s link to the then Senator Brewer’s rear ending a vehicle while drunk driving. Failed 4 field-sobriety tests but as per status quo of ‘politicians’ — was not charged. This happened in 1988 — so drinking isn’t new to the Gov.
http://phxated.com/phxated/all-the-details-of-the-night-jan-brewer-was-apparently-driving-drunk/
January 26, 2012 at 1:27 pm
craigtamy
I love that cartoon with a pregnant Bristol. I have a feeling that Willow will be the next to pop out a baby. Seems the only time a Palin gets married is when they get knocked up. I must be old fashioned, I got married, THEN got pregnant and I’m a flaming liberal. Go figure.
January 26, 2012 at 2:10 pm
malialitman
craigtamy,
I heard that Willow is engaged too. Remember that Palin women get engaged when they are pregnant, but the wedding may not occur!
January 26, 2012 at 6:24 pm
craigtamy
I also heard she was engaged, that was my first thought, that she must be preggo. Sarah’s mother, Sarah and Track all had pre-marital sex, and Bristol still has not married. So if Willow too is pregnant, they are batting 1000. I guess all of Sarah’s abstinence preaching was for everyone else, not her and her family.
January 26, 2012 at 3:35 pm
m
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/289159/gingrich-and-reagan-elliott-abrams
January 26, 2012 at 7:21 pm
Linda
Will someone please tell Tony Lee when people in SC were asked if Palin had any influence, many had not heard what she had said.
As usual she waits for the polls to rise and then grabs her wad of panties and pretend she has influence.